On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 11:06:29AM +0100, Wookey wrote: > On 2023-04-30 13:02 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > >On 30 April 2023 11:39:38 am IST, "Timo Röhling" <roehling@debian.org> wrote: > > > >You can probably even convince upstream to adopt the pkg-config > > >solution and improve the build experience for everyone. > > > Right again. But that said, upstream looks dead. I haven't seen any activity (on sf) since 2011 so I'm not sure how fruitful trying to open an issue there would be. > > > > We may need to patch it in the debian package itself - which had its last maintainer upload in 2006 and has been living off NMUs since then :) > > At least in that case you don't have to convince upstream - we can > just do it right in debian. Filed bug#1035341 against libvdk2-dev. > Filing the bug/patch upstream is still > important just in case they ever wake up again. Filed bug#20 [1] on the upstream repository. Thanks Wookey, Helmut and Timo for nudging me in the right direction! [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/vdkbuilder/bugs/20/ -- Best, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature