Hi, On 29-02-2024 9:40 p.m., Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
it looks like the autopkgtest is using a different version of a package in the actual test vs reference test. The example: For xz-utils ci tests r-bioc-rhtslib. The latest version in testing is 2.4.1+dfsg-1, unstable has -2. The important part is that -2 does not have any armel/armhf binaries because they have been disabled in this version and the old binaries have not yet been removed. The new xz-utils version is tested against !? and fails due to missing binaries: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armel/r/r-bioc-rhtslib/43424315/log.gz The reference test is run against -1 and succeeds: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armel/r/r-bioc-rhtslib/43356017/log.gz Given that -2 is missing binaries and in unstable and the migration test runs against testing, why are there complains about missing binaries?
I need to look closer, but it smells like https://bugs.debian.org/961138 Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature