Re: parted unblock, and upcoming transition
- To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
- Cc: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, debian-release@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: parted unblock, and upcoming transition
- From: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:13:31 +0100
- Message-id: <20100325111331.GA26114@kelgar.0x539.de>
- In-reply-to: <20100325104940.GA25290@kelgar.0x539.de>
- References: <20100311122242.GB23806@riva.ucam.org> <20100317114327.GA31311@kelgar.0x539.de> <20100318000221.GM4484@riva.ucam.org> <20100320165839.GA6154@kelgar.0x539.de> <20100320181558.GQ4484@riva.ucam.org> <20100321145541.GA19057@kelgar.0x539.de> <20100321233806.GF4484@riva.ucam.org> <20100325104940.GA25290@kelgar.0x539.de>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:49:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> so parted FTBFSes on kfreebsd due to configure not knowing about it
> (#575007). Is there progress on this? (As it will block testing
> migration due to kfreebsd issues being RC if the package has built
> successfully before.)
I was told that this might be due to upstream dropping support,
thus also pointing -bsd to it.
I assume parted would be needed for d-i on kfreebsd too?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: