Bug#783278: patch v2
Thanks, I'll take a look when I finally get a spare moment!
On Sun, 2015-05-03 at 13:24 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Yes, you guessed correctly. The v2 patch is the "good" one.
>
> On 05/03/2015 03:19 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 21:25 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> >> Tags: patch
> >>
> >> I botched the first patch. This one fixes it correctly.
> > Thanks for the patch(es). The buglog at
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783278 has somehow
> > ended up with the message ordering confused.
> >
> > I'm pretty certain that the patch which should be correct is this one
> > labelled in the subject as v2 at Message #10 and not what I suppose is
> > v1 which for some reason didn't arrive until Message #15. The date
> > headers match this interpretation.
> >
> > I suppose the first mail got delayed somehow on its way to the BTS so
> > they appear in the opposite order in the log.
> >
> > I thought I ought to double check!
> >
> > Ian.
> >
>
>
Reply to: