Package versioning and upgrades
Since ZoL (ZFS On Linux) isn't yet in Debian GNU/Linux, I've been
doing my own packages for ZoL in that package repo.
This include changes to the installer (debian-installer, base-installer,
grub-installer, partman-target and partman-zfs). But because the Debian
GNU/Linux git repo refuses force pushes, they latest versions is now
in the ZoL GIT repo (https://github.com/zfsonlinux/debian-installers).
But I think I've painted myself into a corner regarding the upgrade
path.
I have four repos:
wheezy => The released ZoL version for Wheezy
wheezy-daily => The GIT master releases of ZoL for Wheezy
jessie => The released ZoL version for Jessie
jessie-daily => The GIT master releases of ZoL for Jessie
So basically, the packages in 'wheezy' and 'jessie' are identical,
except they're compiled on the different versions of Debian GNU/Linux.
Same for 'wheezy-daily' vs. 'jessie-daily'.
Identical, in the meaning that it uses the exact same codebase/version
and patch set of ZoL, just compiled for different libraries
on two different platform version.
But certain upgrade paths isn't working (which isn't much of a
surprise actually - didn't quite think this through I guess):
UPGRADE PATH STATUS VERSION COMPARE
wheezy => wheezy-daily = YES 0.6.3-1.3-1~wheezy lt 0.6.3-38-7d90f5-wheezy
wheezy => jessie = NO 0.6.3-1.3-1~wheezy lt 0.6.3-1.3-1~jessie
wheezy => jessie-daily = YES 0.6.3-1.3-1~wheezy lt 0.6.3-35-7d90f5-jessie
wheezy-daily => jessie = NO 0.6.3-38-7d90f5-wheezy lt 0.6.3-1.3-1~jessie
wheezy-daily => jessie-daily = NO 0.6.3-38-7d90f5-wheezy lt 0.6.3-35-7d90f5-jessie
jessie => jessie-daily = YES 0.6.3-1.3-1~jessie lt 0.6.3-35-7d90f5-jessie
The versions here is the actually versions currently in the repository,
and the result (YES/NO) is the status of "dpkg --compare-versions".
My question now is: How do I setup/change the versioning so that all
of these upgrade paths work?
Doing this in intermediate steps isn't a problem, but I prefer not
to use epochs if possible (even if that would be the simplest
solution :)...
Reply to: