Re: conditional d/rules resulting in different features b/t buster & stretch-backports?
On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 09:08:48AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Fri, 2019-01-04 at 08:36 +0000, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 07:57:01AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> >But AIUI there is no DI built from backports, nor able to use udebs
>> >from backports, so it doesn't matter, does it?
>>
>> Not *yet*, but Kibi and I have been playing with this for a while.
>
>Cool, I gladly stand corrected ;-)
>
>Will that work be targetting stretch-backports though? (IOW, does
>Nicholas need to care about it here and now)
Don't worry about it just now, I guess. :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
We don't need no education.
We don't need no thought control.
Reply to: