Re: Request for backport: btrfs-tools
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Christian Pernegger
<pernegger@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the updated btrfs-tools has arrived in backports, thank you!
>
> It does seem to be affected by #784234 and friends, i.e., making an
> initramfs gives the warning
> "Warning: /sbin/fsck.btrfs doesn't exist, can't install to initramfs, ignoring."
> and fsck.btrfs is in fact not installed.
>
It's not installed because in new package fsck.btrfs exists in the
path /bin/fsck.btrfs.
> I'm not sure if that's a problem, since fsck.btrfs seems to be a no-op
> anyway, but I don't know if there are circumstances where a missing
> fsck binary might cause the boot to fail on principle. Reportedly it's
> fixed in newer versions of initramfs-tools, but I'd rather not pull
> that in as well.
>
> Regards,
> Christian
>
The only problem I've observed is that warning you've raised because
initramfs-tools isn't searching fsck.* in the new path.
Regards,
Aron
Reply to: