Re: Requesting review and upload for Guacamole
Hello Vincent,
Thanks for getting back to me and the feedback.
On 29/08/2014 09:29, Vincent Cheng wrote:
Hi Imran,
(Please let me know if you're subscribed to the list so I can drop you from cc.)
I am subscribed to the mailing list.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Imran Hussain<imranh@sucs.org> wrote:
Hello,
Due to us requiring a new version of Guacamole than what is currently on
offer in wheezy I decided to back port it. We currently have the the package
that I am submitting deployed.
All the packages and sources can be found at
https://sucs.org/~imranh/wheezy-backports/
You should strive to make as minimal amount of changes as possible for
the package to work correctly on wheezy;
I haven't made any changes to the program itself just the packages.
often, a new changelog entry
is sufficient.
Yes that is in both the debian/changelog files.
For your proposed package specifically, you should
revert your changes to debian/control (maintainer field and
dependencies; none of your changes are backport-specific).
I'll revert the changes I made.
If you
think your changes are necessary and that they apply to the current
package in sid, you should forward them to the maintainer via the bug
tracker, but I can tell you right now that restricting dependencies to
version (= ${binary:Version}) when those dependencies are not binary
packages built from the same package is going to break your package
due to unsatisfiable dependencies.
Ah yes, having re-read the docs, that is silly of me and not what I was
aiming to do.
I've done everything you have asked and uploaded it all to the same
place https://sucs.org/~imranh/wheezy-backports/
Thanks,
Imran
--
Imran Hussain
http://sucs.org
Reply to: