Re: glib2.0 on i386
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 02:44:55AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> (07/01/2011):
> > This is kind of an important architecture, so it would be nice to
> > not have it lag behind so far (it just caused
> > http://bugs.debian.org/609277 to occur - while it's nice to catch
> > such bugs, the fact that the build failed is a concern to me). Does
> > the build just need to be requeued?
>
> No, a missing or laggy build doesn't *cause* FTBFS. Point out, or
> reveal an insufficient version in a build-dep, rather.
>
> Requeuing is cheap, given back. Please note that you want to talk to
> the buildd admins for such issues (Cc'd).
I will never give back a package if it clearly has a RC bug in it
that made it fail. Fix the bug instead.
Kurt
Reply to: