Accepted suricata 1:6.0.6-1~bpo10+1 (source) into oldstable-backports-sloppy->backports-policy, oldstable-backports-sloppy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 16:41:55 +0200
Source: suricata
Architecture: source
Version: 1:6.0.6-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports-sloppy
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Pierre Chifflier <pollux@debian.org>
Changed-By: Sascha Steinbiss <satta@debian.org>
Changes:
suricata (1:6.0.6-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports-sloppy; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports-sloppy.
.
suricata (1:6.0.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* Drop patch applied upstream: bigendian-cidr.patch
.
suricata (1:6.0.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Add patch to handle undefined LEVEL1_DCACHE_LINESIZE.
Checksums-Sha1:
f0717b0bed3a2573038c2311d884dde17cffbb55 2859 suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1.dsc
09fdc2e4bf63570ee90d0fbbc41947c0f6c88a1b 33256 suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
be270cfc0a8e6e77d36a498cc760311a98f75971 9844 suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
391d86cc6f564b702a738c8a56f7523ec33b0494c0a9664450a0ce26ad91637c 2859 suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1.dsc
4f769bcc4ab3f8635e9d4b1c6942be0b1292e2eea038952c03a04fc9f584ff04 33256 suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
1b91ec3afe5bca926e72263d6e7e9e251c85e7abe65c49c5c53eb288aba75c24 9844 suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
e81ba86dfe5b8c15af981c7544338b06 2859 net optional suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1.dsc
50a221eed5114a1483732ec27e57000a 33256 net optional suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
24cefb9154bb0c4f4865d949081f776d 9844 net optional suricata_6.0.6-1~bpo10+1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=7zX6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: