Accepted mailscripts 0.23-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports->backports-policy, buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 16:42:05 -0700
Source: mailscripts
Architecture: source
Version: 0.23-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Changes:
mailscripts (0.23-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
mailscripts (0.23-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New script: gmi2email
- add libdbd-sqlite3-perl, libio-socket-ssl-perl, libmime-lite-perl,
libemail-date-format-perl, libtry-tiny-perl, libmailtools-perl and
libxml-feed-perl to Suggests.
.
mailscripts (0.22-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* mailscripts.el:
- drop hard dependency on Projectile
- add new defcustom, mailscripts-project-library
- replace *-projectile commands with new *-to-project commands, which
support both Projectile and project.el for choosing from known
projects
- Use 'cl-case' not 'case' and require cl-lib.
Checksums-Sha1:
98e2d33bb9792690b4889a13c1b9420623bfb507 2242 mailscripts_0.23-1~bpo10+1.dsc
dcc3d38a170d2986f9ac253dc1d8e162a38e4a9b 6020 mailscripts_0.23-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
1bf549c8658c1eff8acefcd11fc17a628ba5a4b36ef0791dec76d21431a7bfb6 2242 mailscripts_0.23-1~bpo10+1.dsc
35a76c1623baf0d2f8816c4e5d3c309f374b232459ad12222b463c8cd970cd37 6020 mailscripts_0.23-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
1131ab19aeb001e5ddf012320e69b138 2242 mail optional mailscripts_0.23-1~bpo10+1.dsc
10ef5e1a61dc4520091930bf58d7aad5 6020 mail optional mailscripts_0.23-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEm5FwB64DDjbk/CSLaVt65L8GYkAFAmBroyoACgkQaVt65L8G
YkDgRQ/+Ie3i55L7Y3RZNkfla7W4aqIaQn0TWdWiHNLF0Gmb1fhPll5xiTSs9KIU
wiGs17X+1xW0TPEPUoh0vFg2naKTOV/FRff54e+wozPNUteJjZvZzLbcfzVMF96W
ntR1kYRO1t4XKPcB7n0Y2KVsuJPKK5EmnaguE6904xwIX/dTxle2My1Z09JEYGIX
hbXoM6aRjC7Uxt4z5Jh6fMEhN+loeSQC/72/x0Kcog16rLzp+CLahnCO3MQo0u+B
OnFGK7vTCtezsZAQd3I48C3T2s5nkbVEPQaCQnzlA41a2C8unmuehruyQ61d8Bw6
AnT+ijDAjzQuXanUu7MIDBC0QolKBEMn0oFfOUtfbrr/Az8F+JG5Z0Niy0B7dbNc
iwASvIsMZMyAC/pKq3KjptL3Dst1CfJHFsjuRJ60DOxGqS9mv+BYqjKFcctUIUW9
4SssdCpLoPJPYRS2TUngUwq+nCANsT4OwtsrOpxvfoCucz+xymfqjgrJo3NCwEMH
vLu+voE6hJI3fjJ0ZfMB/i/zjccdDSF+6n8KXSRlySxM6V/rwz+a56SveMYyCmjR
wzZZNJQd4zDFIfWM1WWuqb37fgY0xrL5tu5+5kuILr32xw1uGKFc3wGbkvNUgps1
9dw/HReEqOL26NuyLpFDCY2qUgPIj/MAle2PUJbRs19ETtA12q0=
=6LXn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: