Accepted mailscripts 0.21-1~bpo10+1 (source) into buster-backports
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 15:19:18 -0700
Source: mailscripts
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21-1~bpo10+1
Distribution: buster-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Changed-By: Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name>
Closes: 961664
Changes:
mailscripts (0.21-1~bpo10+1) buster-backports; urgency=medium
.
* Rebuild for buster-backports.
.
mailscripts (0.21-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* mailscripts.el:
- new command: notmuch-slurp-debbug-at-point
- notmuch-slurp-this-debbug: if fail to extract bug number from
subject line, prompt user for one
- notmuch-slurp-debbug: invoke notmuch to determine the thread-id
rather than passing the search query directly to `notmuch-show'.
That is not how `notmuch-show' is meant to be called and can result
in strange behaviour.
* mbox-extract-patch: When inserting trailers, ensure there is a blank
line before the block of trailers.
* Add a Homepage: to the Debian packaging metadata (Closes: #961664).
Thanks to Daniel Kahn Gillmor for the patch.
Checksums-Sha1:
1e300af6091eacbc670edeb9dc3d5f29fc6cfcec 2242 mailscripts_0.21-1~bpo10+1.dsc
fb9c7ac4b777712fd4d4cfe61aad08bc04bafc9a 5728 mailscripts_0.21-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
288655581083bf6806d6b99f15ed238492364d3c7bc5ed82b154e338b5b3d9d2 2242 mailscripts_0.21-1~bpo10+1.dsc
6fcf28e38aef05a053de85ee17c0596689ce400a923a66443230a54b2920e50c 5728 mailscripts_0.21-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
8fdc08e8ebba2c4b90e21ce2e2ff56f9 2242 mail optional mailscripts_0.21-1~bpo10+1.dsc
edc4443356c11179786f9238399da877 5728 mail optional mailscripts_0.21-1~bpo10+1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=zXnb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: