ganeti-instance-debootstrap_0.7-2~bpo50+1_amd64.changes is NEW
(new) ganeti-instance-debootstrap_0.7-2~bpo50+1.diff.gz extra admin
(new) ganeti-instance-debootstrap_0.7-2~bpo50+1.dsc extra admin
(new) ganeti-instance-debootstrap_0.7-2~bpo50+1_all.deb extra admin
debootstrap-based instance OS definition for ganeti
Ganeti is a virtual server cluster management software tool built on
top of the Xen virtual machine monitor and other Open Source software.
After setting it up it will provide you with an automated environment
to manage highly available virtual machine instances.
.
This package provides an OS definition for ganeti that will allow
installation of Debian (and possibly Unbuntu) instances via
debootstrap.
(new) ganeti-instance-debootstrap_0.7.orig.tar.gz extra admin
Changes: ganeti-instance-debootstrap (0.7-2~bpo50+1) lenny-backports; urgency=low
.
* Rebuild for lenny-backports (switch back to source format 1.0)
.
ganeti-instance-debootstrap (0.7-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Convert source format to 3.0 (quilt)
* Restrict watch file to digits and dots only
* Cherry-pick blktype support from upstream tree
* Add dependency on kpartx
* Standards version 3.8.3 (no changes needed)
* Remove Leonardo (l@lmello.eu.org) from Uploaders
.
ganeti-instance-debootstrap (0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New Upstream Version
* Standards version 3.8.1 (no changes needed)
* Add a conflict with ganeti versions below 1.2.7, as multi-version OSes
are supported only from that version on
.
ganeti-instance-debootstrap (0.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New Upstream Version
Override entries for your package:
Announcing to backports-changes@lists.backports.org
Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of
the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New
packages are usually added to the override file about once a week.
You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.
warnings above
if files already exist in other distributions.
Reply to: