Re: vldm on armhf?

To: debian-arm@lists.debian.org
Cc: Christian Seiler <christian@iwakd.de>
Subject: Re: vldm on armhf?
From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 19:35:21 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.2207201933580.15195@herc.mirbsd.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.2207191820050.305@herc.mirbsd.org>
References: <[🔎] Pine.BSM.4.64L.2207191820050.305@herc.mirbsd.org>

Dixi quod…

>did something change wrt. compiler defaults on armhf recently?

armel also FTBFS with SIGILL in the testsuite.

So something changed incompatibly between 2019-11-10 and now
in the ARM toolchain. But what, and how can I get this to work
again?

Thanks in advance,
//mirabilos
-- 
Solange man keine schmutzigen Tricks macht, und ich meine *wirklich*
schmutzige Tricks, wie bei einer doppelt verketteten Liste beide
Pointer XORen und in nur einem Word speichern, funktioniert Boehm ganz
hervorragend.		-- Andreas Bogk über boehm-gc in d.a.s.r

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: vldm on armhf?
  - From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
- Re: vldm on armhf?
  - From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>

References:
- vldm on armhf?
  - From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: failure trying to install bullseye on Cubox-i
Next by Date: Re: vldm on armhf?
Previous by thread: vldm on armhf?
Next by thread: Re: vldm on armhf?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread