Re: testing and review requested for Wheezy update of apache2

[Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@orangeseeds.org>]

On 2017-01-22 11:25:08, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>  Test Summary Report
>  -------------------
>  t/apache/chunkinput.t             (Wstat: 0 Tests: 37 Failed: 1)
>    Failed test:  3
>  t/apache/contentlength.t          (Wstat: 0 Tests: 24 Failed: 8)
>    Failed tests:  2, 4, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24
> +t/apache/http_strict.t            (Wstat: 0 Tests: 85 Failed: 3)
> +  Failed tests:  2, 8, 26

here are those tests:

2: [ "GET / HTTP/1.0\n\n"                          => 400],
8: [ "GET / HTTP/1.0\0\r\n\r\n"                    => 400],
26: [ "GET / HTTP/1.0\r\nFoo: b\0ar\r\n\r\n"        => 400],

#2 is weird - it just returns nothing now:

$ printf "GET / HTTP/1.0\n\n" | nc localhost 80
$

which is a major WTF for someone used to "telnet into port 80", as UNIX
line endings now fail - which is unexpected of course, but actually
respecting RFC, iirc.

nothing in the logs, and nothing i could find in GDB. the apache2
process just seems to close the socket and leave it at that.

#8 is a plain failure - it actually works and returns 200 instead of
400. same with #26.

so definitely more work to be done there... sigh. i'll review the final
diff to figure out what's going on here.

a.

-- 
During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a
revolutionary act.        - Georges Orwell