Re: Bug#325600: 325600 (<defunct> threads on Alpha).
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:33:23AM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Tom Evans <tom@23palmer.net> writes:
>
> > If I simply change (in
> > linuxthreads/sysdep/unix/sysv/linux/not-cancel.h) from:
> >
> > # define waitpid_not_cancel(pid, stat_loc, options) \
> > INLINE_SYSCALL (osf_wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL)
> >
> > to:
> >
> > # define waitpid_not_cancel(pid, stat_loc, options) \
> > wait4( pid, stat_loc, options, NULL )
> >
> > all is well
>
> That's weird. What happens with -O0? What with gcc 3.3? Can you
> perhaps attach the assembly that is generated for the "broken" case?
Oho: take a look at alpha/wait4.S. It looks like sys_wait4 is
relatively new on Alpha. Anyone know how new?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC
Reply to: