[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Can't build a 2.6 kernel



I am trying to build a 2.6.6 kernel on Alpha.  I started with a .config
that I have been using on i386 and amd64 to build kernels for the Debian
>From Scratch CD.  Those kernels have lots of IDE and SCSI drivers
compiled statically, as well as filesystems, but little else.

I cannot get a kernel built for Alpha.  I am running the latest sid.  I
have tried turning off various things but it still doesn't work.  Here's
what I get:


  GEN     .version
  CHK     include/linux/compile.h
  UPD     include/linux/compile.h
  CC      init/version.o
  LD      init/built-in.o
  LD      .tmp_vmlinux1
init/built-in.o(.text+0x668): In function `huft_build':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0x9d8): In function `huft_free':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0xf24): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0xf8c): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0xf94): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0xf9c): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0xfa4): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0x1004): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0x1010): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0x1020): In function `inflate_codes':
: relocation truncated to fit: BRADDR .init.text
init/built-in.o(.text+0x1260): In function `inflate_stored':
: additional relocation overflows omitted from the output
make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/home/jgoerzen/programs/kernel/kernel-source-2.6.6'
make: *** [stamp-build] Error 2



Reply to: