Re: new ada branch for common utils
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le 06/09/2010 22:46, Ludovic Brenta a écrit :
> xavier grave <xavier.grave@ipno.in2p3.fr> writes:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I'd like to create a new branch (monotone one @ ada-france) to factorise
>> all Ada tools/utils we have around, for example :
>> - in org.log4Ada
>> options.ad[sb]
>> - in narval.core.pro
>> low_level_network-utils
>> get interfaces (for linux and freebsd)
>> get address
>> network_utils
>>
>> Do you agree on such new branch and how do you think we should call it ?
>
> I'm all for factorizing but... putting unrelated bits and pieces
> together in a branch is not exactly factorizing, is it? If these bits
> and pieces formed a consistent whole, you wouldn't have to ask the
> question of how to name the branch, methinks.
You are right (as usual :) ? ).
> So, if you really think these should be in a different branch, I'd
> suggest creating several branches e.g. org.xavier-grave.options,
> org.xavier-grave.low_level_network_utils.
I'll do something like org.xavier-grave.network_tools.
> BTW, how is options.ad[sb] different from GNAT.Command_Line (which
> contains a binding to GNU getopt)?
I definitively have to look for this getopt instead my options stuff.
xavier
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkyF7ygACgkQVIZi0A5BZF43twCgvzrbAqTvbPuTj1PgrwTQJ24V
swIAoL7pgd9fLANYxC4GCHrju0yX3cXv
=YSbv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: