Re: [buildd] binutils failure

To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: debian-68k@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [buildd] binutils failure
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.64.0610241740180.7817@scrub.home>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0610241234540.30455@xplor.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
References: <[🔎] 453CB683.5010205@midg3t.net> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0610241234540.30455@xplor.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>

Hi,

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Michael Schmitz wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> binutils failed on q650 due to undeclared PAGE_SIZE. Ideas, anyone?

Upgrade linux-kernel-headers.

bye, Roman

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [buildd] binutils failure
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>

References:
- [buildd] ccontrol ready for m68k
  - From: Ted Percival <ted@midg3t.net>
- [buildd] binutils failure
  - From: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@mail.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>

Prev by Date: Re: python2.4 build failed for stable-security
Next by Date: Re: m68k release future
Previous by thread: [buildd] binutils failure
Next by thread: Re: [buildd] binutils failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread