also sprach Bernelle Verster <bernellev@gmail.com> [2015-02-26 10:41 +0100]:
> > Instead of starting a discussion up front, I posit that the best way
> > will be to create a mockup with fairly little effort (so that not
> > too much could be wasted) and then to propose it to the list.
> >
> Is this mockup enough: http://snyman.info/debconf16/
Yeah. Maybe needs a bit more to give an understanding of the general
UI approach, and maybe you could hint at how you plan to integrate
summit? Or whatever solution you are going to try to push.
> > have uncertainty about the event until 4 months before it
> > happens. Isn't UCT able to engage in an exceptional contract
> > with us, considering this is likely a non-standard thing for
> > them anyway?
> >
> No sorry, March of 2015, so in a month, or a week, if we're lucky.
> I expect this to be fairly standard for them, actually.
Ok. Phew. For a second I really got scared.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft
: :' : proud Debian developer
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
"the question of whether computers can think
is like the question of whether submarines can swim."
-- edsgar w. dijkstra
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)