Re: [Debconf-team] Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 06:28:37PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> Richard
>
> Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
So it is now a bug against bugs.debian.org with a request for more info.
See Don's response below. I'll follow up in #776982. I think I can
provide the requested info. But, of course, suggestions from the team
will help.
1) pseudo-package name: summit.debconf.org
2) description: Issues regarding the summit.debconf.org software and
service
3) maintainer address: debconf-team@lists.debconf.org ?
I would not be comfortable with this being just me or any other single
person.
Bug examples: https://wiki.debconf.org/wiki/Summit#TODO and #DONE
TODOs in summit.git (and maybe my local TODO)
Those are probably enough, but I can also dig up some relevant
mailinglist threads from this year and last.
-edrz
>From debbugs@buxtehude.debian.org Tue Feb 3 14:27:52 2015
Subject: Bug#776982: Request for summit.debconf.org pseudo-package
Reply-To: owner@bugs.debian.org, 776982@bugs.debian.org
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:23:17 -0800
From: Don Armstrong <don@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Control: submitter -1 Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@zhevny.com>
Control: retitle -1 add summit.debconf.org psuedo-package
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> The DebConf Infrastructure team requests a new pseudo-package,
> summit.debconf.org, for use in tracking bugs, feature requests and so
> forth for DebConf's instance of the Summit conference management
> system.
In order to create the psuedopackage, I need the
1) name of the psuedopackage
Presumably, that's "summit.debconf.org" in this case.
2) a short description of what the pseudopackage will be used for
(suitable for inclusion in https://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages)
3) The e-mail address of the maintainer of the psuedopackage who will
receive mail related to that mailing list
I also like to see an example existing bugs (or e-mails which would have
been/will be turned into bugs) which will be reassigned to this
pseudopackage once it is created. This is primarily so that I know that
the pseudopackage will be used.
Finally, I must note that the name of the psuedopackage will never be
available for a Debian package in the archive. [Given the name chosen,
that seems fine.]
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
What I can't stand is the feeling that my brain is leaving me for
someone more interesting.
Reply to: